Suite 235, 139 Cardigan St, Carlton Vic 3053

Work Hours
we are available 24/7

Master CDR Report writing with our strategies, overcome common CDR Report challenges, and boost your Australian skilled migration visa success.

Top 8 Reasons for Your CDR Rejection

Learn why Engineers Australia rejects CDRs - lack of Aus. qualifications, insufficient evidence of competency. Get detailed explanations, tips, and optimize your report for immigration to Australia. #CDR #EngineersAustralia.


Are you an engineer immigrating to Australia and dreading the thought of CDR Rejection? Well, fear not! In this blog post, we will be diving into the top 8 reasons why competency demonstration reports are commonly rejected, providing you with valuable insights and tips to ensure that your own CDR Report submission stands out among the crowd.

Whether you’re a civil engineer, mechanical engineer, electrical engineer, or any other branch of engineering, this post is tailored just for you. So, strap on your thinking caps, because we’re about to embark on an educational journey that will not only help you understand the complexities of the CDR Report assessment process but also equip you with the knowledge and tools needed to overcome potential pitfalls. Say goodbye to sleepless nights worrying about rejected CDRs and hello to a successful engineering career in Australia!

According to the Australian Government’s Department of Home Affairs,

As of June 2021, there were 1,617 primary visas granted under the Skilled Independent visa (subclass 189) for Engineering Professionals (excluding Electronics Engineers).

However, not all who applied were successful, as CDR rejection is a common hurdle faced by many engineers. This can be due to numerous reasons such as mismatches in the selected Engineering Disciplines/Branches, non-compliance with the MSA Booklet Guidelines, or issues with Career Episodes like not meeting the Word Count Requirement or containing Plagiarized Content.

Top 8 Reasons for Your CDR Rejection
Top 8 Reasons for Your CDR Rejection 1

Understanding Engineers Australia and Migration Skills Assessment

As an engineer, I understand the challenges that come with obtaining approval to practice in another country. The process can be daunting, especially when it comes to Engineers Australia’s Migration Skills Assessment. In this article, I will break down the purpose and process of migration skills assessment to help you understand what it entails.

Engineering Disciplines/Branches Recognised by Engineers Australia

To practice as an engineer in Australia, you must first become a member of Engineers Australia. Engineers Australia is the designated assessing authority for engineering occupations under the skilled migration program. Its role is to assess the eligibility of engineers who wish to immigrate to Australia. The assessment is based on the applicant’s work experience, qualifications, and skills in their chosen engineering discipline.

Engineers Australia recognizes eleven engineering disciplines/branches, which include:

As an applicant, it is imperative that you identify the engineering discipline that matches your qualifications and work experience accurately.

Purpose and Process of Migration Skills Assessment

The Migration Skills Assessment (MSA) is designed to review an applicant’s qualifications and work experience to ensure they meet the requirements for a skilled migration visa. The MSA is also used to assess an applicant’s competence to practice as a professional engineer in Australia.

The MSA process has three components:

1. Preliminary Assessment:

This is a fee-based service that evaluates an applicant’s academic qualifications and professional experience. The outcome of this assessment will determine if the applicant is eligible to apply for a full Migration Skills Assessment.

2. CDR Report:

Competency Demonstration Report (CDR Report) is a key component of the MSA process. The CDR Report is a document that describes the applicant’s engineering education, work experience, and skills. The CDR Report must adhere to the MSA Booklet Guidelines and meet the required word count limit. It must also be free of plagiarism.

The CDR Report consists of three Career Episodes, a CDR Summary Statement, and a Continuing Professional Development (CPD) document. Each Career Episode must showcase an engineering problem that the applicant encountered and the solutions they developed using their engineering skills and knowledge.

3. Technical Interview:

The final component of the MSA process is a technical interview that evaluates an applicant’s engineering skills and knowledge. The interview panel consists of senior engineers who will ask questions based on the applicant’s engineering discipline.

In conclusion, the migration skills assessment is a rigorous process designed to ensure that only qualified engineers are allowed to practice in Australia. As an applicant, it is essential to understand the purpose and process of the MSA; this will help you to prepare adequately for the assessment. I hope that this article has provided you with useful insights into the Engineers Australia and Migration Skills Assessment process.

Reason 1: Non-Adherence to MSA Booklet Guidelines

As professional engineers, we all know the importance of adhering to guidelines when it comes to creating quality work. In the case of immigrating to Australia, the Migration Skills Assessment (MSA) Booklet Guidelines are crucial to the success of your career episodes and CDR report.

The MSA Booklet Guidelines provide a comprehensive list of requirements that must be met when submitting your CDR report for assessment by Engineers Australia. This includes requirements such as the correct format for your CDR report, the appropriate word count for each section, and detailed information on the structure of your career episodes.

It’s essential to follow these guidelines to ensure that your CDR report meets the standards set by Engineers Australia, and to prevent the unfortunate scenario of having your CDR rejected.

  • Plagiarism is a common reason for CDR rejection
  • Non-adherence to word count requirements is another common issue
  • Passionate engineers may provide excessive detail, so stick to the specific limits for each section
  • Non-adherence to guidelines for structure and content of career episodes can lead to rejection
  • Follow specific guidelines for each engineering discipline/branch required for skill assessment

Reason 2: Insufficient Details in Career Episodes

One common reason for the rejection of CDR reports is the lack of sufficient details in Career Episodes. It is crucial to understand that EA assessors use these episodes to gain insight into your engineering projects, responsibilities, and contributions. Therefore, it’s necessary to provide a comprehensive description of your engineering career in each episode.

Some common mistakes that applicants make when detailing their Career Episodes include:

  • No Relevant engineering background: Your career episode should clearly state your academic qualifications, work experience, and provide a brief overview of your engineering discipline.
  • Inaccurate Descriptions: EA assessors seek clear and concise descriptions of your engineering projects, responsibilities, and contributions. Use industry-specific terminology to demonstrate your understanding of your role and its impact. Avoid overly technical jargon.
  • Not linking contributions to engineering competency: Career Episodes provide evidence for the competencies claimed in your competency demonstration report. Explain how you applied your engineering knowledge and skills in each project. Link your contributions to the elements of your engineering competency in the Summary Statement.
  • Providing a general description of the project without explaining your role in the project
  • Not highlighting your engineering skills and knowledge and how they were applied in the project
  • Not providing enough technical details such as calculations, designs, drawings, and specifications
  • Using vague language or cliches, instead of demonstrating how your engineering skills were utilized in the project.

To avoid making these mistakes, it is important to understand the guidelines provided by Engineers Australia for writing the Career Episodes. The Migration Skills Assessment (MSA) Booklet Guidelines provide clear instructions on what should be included in the Career Episodes, including the word count requirement and the type of information that should be included in each paragraph.

Reason 3: Inaccurate Engineering Disciplines/Branches Selection

Choosing the wrong engineering discipline or branch can have serious consequences and can even lead to the rejection of your CDR. Let’s delve deeper into why selecting the correct discipline is essential and the possible outcomes of getting it wrong.

Importance of selecting the right Engineering Disciplines/Branches

Selecting the correct engineering discipline or branch is crucial because it will determine the specific competencies and skills that are required for your competency demonstration report. Different engineering disciplines have specific requirements, and if you choose the wrong one, you’ll have to demonstrate unlikely skills and experience that you don’t possess. Your CDR Report Sample must be relevant and contain the right information, and it can only be possible if you choose the right discipline.

Consequences of incorrect selection

Choosing the wrong engineering discipline or branch can be disastrous, and the consequences of such an error include:

  1. Your CDR will not be relevant: Selecting the wrong engineering branch will result in providing information that is unrelated to the chosen branch. Your CDR Report must demonstrate that you have the required skills and competencies of the engineering discipline you’ve selected.
  2. CDR will be rejected: If the discrepancies are significant and evident, your CDR will not be approved. The assessors can reject your CDR Report if it doesn’t match the chosen branch’s requirements.
  3. Delayed application processing: If your CDR is rejected, you have to take time to amend it, which can lead to a delay in the application process. A delay can be stressful, and it can even lead to the application being returned or cancelled.
  4. sometimes lead to unnecessary delays, more expenses, and total rejection Choosing the wrong engineering branch means you’ll lack the experience and skills required for your chosen branch. You may require additional training or experience in a new area, which can be financially and time-consuming.

In conclusion, selecting the right engineering discipline or branch is critical in achieving a successful visa application. To avoid CDR rejection, always choose the engineering branch that aligns with your skills and experience. It’s also crucial to conduct research and consult with experts to identify the right discipline when writing your CDR. Remember, the wrong selection can sometimes lead to unnecessary delays, more expenses, and total rejection.

Reason 4: Exceeding or Not Meeting the Word Count Requirement

The CDR Report is a comprehensive document that requires you to provide three Career Episodes, a Summary Statement, and a Continuing Professional Development (CPD). The Career Episodes are the most crucial components of the CDR. It is in these episodes that you need to showcase your engineering skills and competencies. Engineers Australia has set a word limit of 1000-2500 words for each career episode, and the total word count must not exceed 10,000 words. Exceeding or not meeting this word count requirement can lead to CDR rejection.

How exceeding or not meeting this requirement can lead to CDR rejection

Exceeding or not meeting the word count requirement is a recipe for CDR rejection. Here are some reasons why:

  1. Exceeding the word count requirement shows that you’re unable to follow instructions. Engineers Australia has set these requirements to ensure that everyone follows the same format. Exceeding the word count requirement shows that you’re not willing to play by the rules, and this can harm your chances of getting your CDR approved.
  2. Not meeting the word count requirement can make your career episodes look inadequate. If your word count is significantly less than the required word count, it can appear that you did not put enough effort into writing your career episodes. This is an alarm bell for the Engineers Australia assessors who are looking for detailed information about your engineering projects and experiences.
  3. Overwriting or underwriting can indicate a lack of attention to detail. If you write too much and exceed the limit, it may indicate that you’re unable to condense your ideas concisely. In contrast, writing too little means that you may have left out critical information that could affect the Engineers Australia assessment.

Tips for getting it right

Achieving the perfect word count is achievable when following a few simple tips:

  1. Read and understand the guidelines and requirements for CDR Report Writing.
  2. Be concise and to the point. Avoid using extra words and filler content that is irrelevant to the career episode.
  3. Use bullet points, tables, and diagrams wherever possible to break down information.
  4. Get feedback from peers, colleagues, or professional engineers to help you review and refine your career episodes.

Reason 5: Plagiarized Content

The Engineers Australia (EA) organization takes plagiarism very seriously, and it will not be tolerated in any aspect of CDR writing. In fact, if you are caught with plagiarized content in your report, you will be banned from applying for a Skilled Migration visa for at least 12 months. This is a serious consequence that could have a significant impact on your future career prospects.

Moreover, EA has a robust system to detect plagiarism in the CDRs submitted to them. They use a sophisticated software called Turnitin, which is commonly used in universities and institutions to verify the originality of academic papers. This software can detect even the slightest hint of plagiarism, such as copied passages, paraphrased content, or even similar sentence structures.

In addition to committing an ethical and academic violation, plagiarized content can also adversely affect the overall quality and credibility of your CDR. It can raise doubts in the minds of assessing officers regarding your honesty, integrity, and professional capabilities. This can ultimately lead to CDR rejection, even if you meet all the necessary requirements to become approved for immigration.

Reason 6: Lack of Australian Engineering Qualifications

WhatsApp Image 2024 01 22 at 09.57.33 f9bf7432
Top 8 Reasons for Your CDR Rejection 2

Australian Engineering Qualifications are the minimum requirements set by Engineers Australia for Skilled Migration. These qualifications are necessary for engineers who wish to practice in Australia and must meet specific criteria. The criteria include:

1. Accreditation from Engineers Australia:

The institution that grants your qualification must be accredited by Engineers Australia. If the institution is not accredited, your application may get rejected.

2. Overseas Qualifications:

Engineers who have acquired their qualifications overseas may have to go through a competency assessment or undertake further studies to meet the Australian engineering qualifications.

3. Substantial coverage of key areas in engineering:

The qualification must provide adequate knowledge in key areas of engineering such as mathematics, physics, and chemistry. If these areas are not covered, your application may get rejected.

4. English language proficiency:

You must demonstrate your proficiency in the English language by providing either IELTS scores or an equivalent score from a recognized English language test.

How lacking these qualifications can result in CDR rejection:

If you do not have the required Australian engineering qualifications, your CDR may get rejected. This is because the Australian government requires the minimum qualifications to ensure that you have an adequate level of knowledge and experience to work as an engineer in Australia. If you have studied engineering outside Australia, it’s essential to evaluate your qualifications against the Australian standards to identify any areas of deficiency. This evaluation process is called CDR Skilled Migration Assessment, and it’s conducted by Engineers Australia.

Reason 7: Insufficient Evidence of Competency

One of the main reasons why CDRs get rejected is due to insufficient evidence of competency. This can happen due to various reasons, including not being able to prove your skills in a manner that complies with the Engineers Australia (EA) guidelines. It is essential to provide evidence of your competency in a clear and concise manner. Failure to do so can lead to delays in the assessment process, extra costs, and even rejection of the CDR, which ultimately means you will not be able to immigrate to Australia.

Below are some reasons why there might be insufficient evidence of competency and how it can lead to CDR rejection:

Lack of Detail:

Sometimes, engineers forget to include all the necessary details in their CDR. EA has provided clear guidelines on what to include in the CDR, such as a Career Episode, Summary Statement, and Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Statement. It is essential to ensure that each section has the required detail and that the information is accurate and verifiable.

Inaccurate Information:

In some cases, engineers include inaccurate information in their CDR, either knowingly or unknowingly. Providing falsified information is a serious offence and can lead to the rejection of the CDR and possible bans on future applications. Always ensure that the information provided in the CDR is accurate and genuine.

Lack of Focus:

One of the significant reasons for the rejection of CDRs is a lack of focus. Engineers need to focus on their relevant experiences and highlight them in their CDRs. The CDR needs to be tailored to their chosen occupation, so it is better to focus only on relevant experiences and qualifications. Including irrelevant details in the CDR could lead to information overload for the assessor, leading to an unfavourable evaluation.

How to Avoid CDR Rejection Due to Insufficient Evidence of Competency

There are some measures that engineers can take to avoid their CDR being rejected due to a lack of sufficient evidence of competency. Here are some tips to consider:

  • Read and understand the Engineers Australia Migration Skills Assessment Booklet and Migration Skills Assessment Guidelines
  • Ensure that the CDR report is based on the appropriate occupational category as stated in the ANZSCO code
  • Ensure that all the elements in the CDR report are carefully addressed, including the three career episodes and summary statement
  • Demonstrate a logical sequence of events occurring during your engineering activities and use the first person when describing your roles and responsibilities
  • Focus on practical experience and engineering skills, and describe engineering problem-solving strategies
  • Ensure that your CDR report complies with the EA referencing system and cites the latest engineering codes and standards
  • Seek the advice of a professional CDR writing service to increase your chances of submission approval.

In conclusion, it’s essential to remember that the CDR Report Writing is the most crucial step in the migration process for engineers wanting to immigrate to Australia. Lack of evidence of competency is a significant reason why CDRs get rejected. By adhering to the EA’s guidelines and ensuring that all requirements are met in detail, applicants can avoid issues related to insufficient evidence of competency, which could lead to rejection of the CDR.

Reason 8: Poor Language Skills and How It Can Lead to CDR Rejection

As engineers aspiring to immigrate to Australia, it is essential to have fluent language skills. Poor language skills can not only affect your ability to communicate effectively in the workplace but also lead to rejection of your Competency Demonstration Report (CDR). The CDR is a crucial document that describes your engineering skills, qualifications, and work experience. It is used to assess your eligibility for skilled migration to Australia. In this article, we discuss how poor language skills can lead to CDR rejection and steps to improve your language skills.

Why Are Language Skills Important in the CDR?

The CDR is assessed by Engineers Australia, which is the assessing authority for engineering-related occupations in Australia. It is a comprehensive report that requires an engineer to showcase their engineering competency in a particular engineering occupation. The CDR includes essays, professional development, and engineering project reports. All these must be done with impeccable language skills. Engineers Australia uses the CDR to ascertain if an engineer has the necessary competencies and skills for their occupation.

How Poor Language Skills Can Lead to CDR Rejection

Poor language skills can lead to CDR rejection for the following reasons:

  1. Inability to Demonstrate Competency. When there are grammatical errors or incorrect use of vocabulary, it will affect your ability to convey your understanding and experience concisely and clearly. It may imply that we have poor competency, leading to the rejection of the report.
  2. Failure to Meet the Required Language Proficiency Level. Engineers Australia (EA) requires applicants to meet the minimum English language proficiency level, known as the International English Language Testing System (IELTS). IELTS assesses your abilities in listening, reading, writing, and speaking English. If your proficiency level is below the required threshold, your CDR could face rejection.
  3. Misinterpretation. The assessors may misinterpret your qualifications, experience, and abilities, leading to rejection.
  4. Clarity. Poorly written reports are often unclear, making it hard for the assessors to understand the technical concepts used.
  5. Grammatical Errors. Incorrect grammar, spelling, or sentence structure can make your CDR difficult to read and understand, leading to rejection.
  6. Contextual Misplacement. If an applicant uses an out-of-context word or phrase, assessors may question their understanding and judge them harshly.

How to Avoid CDR Rejection Due to Poor Language Skills

To improve your language skills and avoid CDR rejection, do the following:

  1. Language Proficiency. Ensure that you attain the required language proficiency level before applying for a CDR.
  2. Consult Professional Writers. Seek help from professional writers who specialize in CDR Report Writing.
  3. Practice. Make a habit of practising writing, speaking, and reading in English regularly. Use online resources like language exchange apps to improve your language skills.
  4. Peer Review. Have someone proofread your work before submitting it.
  5. Use Good Vocabulary. Use technical vocabulary correctly, and avoid using words or phrases out of context.
  6. Attend English Classes. Enroll in English classes to improve your language skills.

In conclusion, poor language skills can lead to the rejection of your CDR, which is a crucial document for skilled migration to Australia. As an engineer, it is essential to have excellent language skills and use them effectively in your CDR. Improving your language skills is an ongoing process, but it is worth the effort. Practice regularly, have someone proofread your work, use good technical vocabulary correctly, and attend English classes. Your efforts will improve your chances of CDR acceptance and ultimately lead to successful immigration to Australia.


In sum, the possibility of CDR rejection is a reality for many engineers aiming for skill migration to Australia. However, by being aware of the common causes of rejection, such as poor language skills, and taking proactive measures, you can significantly increase your chances of acceptance. Remember, your CDR is a comprehensive account of your engineering skills and competencies, and its language should reflect your professionalism and attention to detail.

Need Help?

The rejection of a Competency Demonstration Report (CDR) can be a significant setback for any engineering professional seeking to make their mark in Australia. The reasons for rejection might range from a lack of understanding of the EA guidelines, insufficient detail in career episodes, poor English language skills, among others.

Yet, these obstacles are not insurmountable. With proper guidance and a clear understanding of the requirements, you can create a CDR that accurately showcases your skills and competencies. Remember, your CDR is more than just a document; it’s a reflection of your professional journey and potential.
If you’re struggling with your CDR, don’t hesitate to seek professional assistance.

CDR Elite Writers specializes in crafting high-quality CDRs that adhere to Engineers Australia’s standards. Our team of seasoned writers understand the intricacies of the CDR writing process and can help you navigate through this crucial phase of your career.

Whether you need help starting from scratch or improving an existing report, we’re here to assist. We’re just one click away at CDR Elite Writers. Let us help you turn your CDR rejection into an opportunity for success.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *